Manager proposes the new maximum
The City publishes a $6.6 billion plan at a $0.579530 rate, along with taxpayer-impact documents and departmental volumes.
Budget cycle · FY 2026–27
Voters rejected 57.40¢ in November 2025, and on August 12, 2026 Council adopted 57.99¢ without an election. The original proposal is preserved below.
The City publishes a $6.6 billion plan at a $0.579530 rate, along with taxpayer-impact documents and departmental volumes.
Council approves the notice ceiling, holds a budget hearing, authorizes a $5.23 million efficiency-study contract, and sends the audit charter amendment (Prop I) to the November ballot.
$6.6 billion citywide, including a $1.5 billion General Fund, at $0.579948 per $100 taxable value.
Voters decide whether an independent efficiency audit becomes a charter requirement before any future tax-rate election. We say yes. Read the case.
The Manager proposed $6.6 billion and a $0.579530 rate, with a typical annual property-tax increase of $173.87 and combined tax-and-fee increase of $345.95. The adopted rate came in slightly higher, and the typical-home example came down because the City changed its example home rather than because anyone cut spending. These are historical proposal figures, kept as published.
The $113.76 figure is the City's modeled change for its own typical taxpayer. Your City levy depends on your City taxable value. If your appraisal went up more than the City’s example, so did your increase. Run your own numbers. Your full bill also includes the school district, county, and other taxing units.